Abisola Fatokun

Image by COG LOG LAB. via Flickr

This is for those friends of mine who believe that Apple (and by extension Steve Jobs) does not innovate.

I won’t waste another breath arguing that point with anyone. And that is a promise that I am making to myself. I will, instead, let all these people speak of what great things Mr Jobs has achieved in such a short period of time.

Bill Gates

“The world rarely sees someone who has had the profound impact Steve has had, the effects of which will be felt for many generations to come. For those of us lucky enough to get to work with him, it’s been an insanely great honor. I will miss Steve immensely.”

Larry Page

“I am very, very sad to hear the news about Steve. He was a great man with incredible achievements and amazing brilliance. He always seemed to be able to say in very few words what you actually should have been thinking before you thought it. His focus on the user experience above all else has always been an inspiration to me. He was very kind to reach out to me as I became CEO of Google and spend time offering his advice and knowledge even though he was not at all well. My thoughts are with his family and the whole Apple family.”

Roger Ebert, Pulitzer-prize winning film critic

“I got one of the first Macs, and my relationship with computers fundamentally changed. In both of his incarnations at Apple, he was a visionary. He provided tools. His victories were based on imagination and courage.”

Abisola Fatokun

“Steve Jobs has played a huge part in shaping the person I am today. Ever since I enjoyed the privilege of owning my first Mac back in 1993, I have developed an emotional connection to its creator. Now, Steve, hurry along… your journey continues. You have left behind a legacy that will live on with mankind. Thank you for everything.”

John Lasseter, Chief Creative Officer, and Ed Catmull, President, Walt Disney and Pixar Animation Studios

“Steve Jobs was an extraordinary visionary, our very dear friend and the guiding light of the Pixar family. He saw the potential of what Pixar could be before the rest of us, and beyond what anyone ever imagined. Steve took a chance on us and believed in our crazy dream of making computer animated films; the one thing he always said was to simply ‘make it great.’ He is why Pixar turned out the way we did and his strength, integrity and love of life has made us all better people. He will forever be a part of Pixar’s DNA. Our hearts go out to his wife Laurene and their children during this incredibly difficult time.”

Jerry Yang

“Steve was my hero growing up. He not only gave me a lot of personal advice and encouragement, he showed all of us how innovation can change lives.I will miss him dearly, as will the world.”

Mark Zuckerberg

“Steve, thank you for being a mentor and a friend. Thanks for showing that what you build can change the world. I will miss you.”

Tim Cook, CEO of Apple

“No words can adequately express our sadness at Steve’s death or our gratitude for the opportunity to work with him. We will honor his memory by dedicating ourselves to continuing the work he loved so much.”

President Barack Obama

“The world has lost a visionary. And there may be no greater tribute to Steve’s success than the fact that much of the world learned of his passing on a device he invented. Michelle and I send our thoughts and prayers to Steve’s wife Laurene, his family, and all those who loved him.”

Bob Iger, CEO of Disney

“Steve was such an ‘original,’ with a thoroughly creative, imaginative mind that defined an era. Despite all he accomplished, it feels like he was just getting started. With his passing the world has lost a rare original, Disney has lost a member of our family, and I have lost a great friend.”

Steve Ballmer

“I want to express my deepest condolences at the passing of Steve Jobs, one of the founders of our industry and a true visionary. My heart goes out to his family, everyone at Apple and everyone who has been touched by his work.”

Meg Whitman, President and CEO, HP

“Steve Jobs was an iconic entrepreneur and businessman whose impact on technology was felt beyond Silicon Valley. He will be remembered for the innovation he brought to market and the inspiration he brought to the world.”

Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City

“Tonight our City — a city that has always had such respect and admiration for creative genius — joins with people around the planet in remembering a great man and keeping Laurene and the rest of the Jobs family in our thoughts and prayers.”

Sir James Dyson, innovator and entrepreneur

“He was dubbed a megalomaniac, but Steve Jobs often gambled on young, largely inexperienced talent to take Apple forward; Jony Ive and his team prove that such faith was spot on.”

Sergey Brin

“From the earliest days of Google, whenever Larry and I sought inspiration for vision and leadership, we needed to look no farther than Cupertino. Steve, your passion for excellence is felt by anyone who has ever touched an Apple product (including the macbook I am writing this on right now). And I have witnessed it in person the few times we have met. On behalf of all of us at Google and more broadly in technology, you will be missed very much. My condolences to family, friends, and colleagues at Apple.”

Culled from Wired Magazine online.

iPad by Leondel - Flickr

I have asked myself many times over why there is such a dislike (hatred might be a bit too strong for this) for products made by Apple. They are typically labelled as hugely overpriced, feature light, underpowered and so on.

Admittedly, it is a small percentage – albeit very vocal – of people who hold these views and the majority of the population covet Apple products.  I have no empirical data to support my latter claim but I dare say I was spot on.

These people go even further and openly deride people who buy and love Apple products as being stupid slaves of technology trendiness.

Why do these people dislike Apple products so much, and why do they pour so much derision (and sometimes even vitriol) on those people who do? It is almost rabid. I remember very clearly having a heated conversation 2 years ago with an acquaintance who claimed Windows phone 6.5 was better BY FAR than the iPhone. Where do you start the discussion with people like that? Very intelligent and highly educated people to boot. I almost feel as though we have all been hoodwinked by the success of Microsoft from years ago into believing that vertically integrated markets were doomed to failure, and that ‘leveraging’ was the only way to succeed in the technology world.

I blame the business schools for this as well. Educational programs that depend on case studies for teaching MBA students give very little room for creativity and ‘thinking outside the box’.

The huge success that is Apple today has befuddled analysts the world over. They do not understand why the company has been so successful nor do they understand why people love their products so much. This confusion extends to most technology pundits as well as their very intelligent audience. And yet, for those people who have followed Apple very closely for decades, it is not so much of a surprise. I, for one, am not surprised.

There is only so far ‘features’ can take you, only so much more memory and CPU that you can throw at your hardware… Many years ago, I used to help University lecturers buy their computers. I still remember very clearly how frustrated they got by not being able to understand the difference between Intel and AMD or between Centrino and Celerons, between Pentium III and Pentium IV, nor why they needed to know these things. An yet we techie people got it and were exasperated that we couldn’t get others to understand. We concluded that these people were just ‘thick’ and we treated them accordingly.

But Apple got these people the way the rest of the technology world didn’t. That is all they needed to do. That is the major difference between Apple and Microsoft or between Apple and HP, Dell (put any other commodity hardware supplier here). Apple believes more in the ‘experience’ of using technology and this shows in the ease of use they are constantly being applauded for. They will not shy from removing features or components that they believe are not integral to the functionality and experience they wish to provide their users. They will also remove components that are not absolutely required in order to save on manufacturing costs and therefore the final price of their products. This is another gripe of the Apple naysayers.

With this realisation, going back to the question of why there is so much derision towards Apple products makes me realise that there is another question to be asked: “what is the demographic of these people who hate Apple products so much?” apart from those who were told in their Churches that Steve Jobs was a bad man whom I am not even going to talk about here, most of the naysayers are techie people.

I think it is safe to say that there might be resentment towards Apple’s ‘dumbification’ of technology. And that might be at the root of the problem here. Apple gets those people who we concluded (and labelled) as thick and is able to communicate with them in a language they understand. Therefore effectively sidelining us.

That must really hurt.

But what if these people are right. What if Apple’s products were really a swindle? What if these people – like in the story of the Emperor’s new clothes – are the ones who truly get that Apple is fooling us all into buying their products? A compelling proposition, admittedly but contestable by a billboard I used to see of the French biro maker Bic when I was much younger :

“17 million customers cannot be wrong…”

There are a LOT of customers that claim Apple products are great to use. Apple consistently comes out on top in customer satisfaction surveys year after year, winning product design awards in the process. Surely this cannot be a case of mass hypnotism… Surely. Or is it?

Apple is now flirting with the position of being the most capitalised company in the world. And that is a scary prospect considering their iPad has not even really caught on yet. The post-PC world is just dawning and HP and IBM have bailed out. Microsoft is still in denial about what this portends and the other commodity hardware suppliers (OEM manufacturers) are quavering in their boots at the lack of direction from Redmond.

Related articles

• It’s not magic: How Apple achieves greatness (macworld.com)
• HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market (zdnet.com)
• HP Decides to spin off the PC Division what next for Microsoft. (techwag.com)

Image by laihiu via Flickr

Over the past few months, sales numbers for Android have shown an astounding and, frankly, unprecedented – almost logarithmic – growth. I won’t bore you with the details here as you can easily Google this information or otherwise check Horace Dediu’s website, which I highly recommend by the way if you like a visual take on statistics. Instead, I want to give a thought to the conclusions of analysts and pundits on the basis of the Android projections, especially in regards to growth potential in the developing world.

The rapid growth of Android, mostly at the expense of RIM (Blackberry OS) and Nokia (Symbian), has resulted in technology pundits and analysts making predictions about the mobile market following the same pattern as the Windows PC market. Are these predictions bold or lazy?

Respected Venture Capitalist Fred Wilson even went as far as dumping Apple stock two years ago and is now actively canvassing developers to move to Android as their primary development platform. His argument is that the new frontier for growth is the developing world and Android – with its commoditized handsets – is well positioned to capture this space. Android devices are probably the cheapest for mobile device manufacturers to produce as the OS is free and all they need do is focus on streamlining manufacturing costs.

Cheap works in the developing world. Apple’s iPhone is expensive and the cost will seem prohibitive to growth in the developing world to any technology analyst looking at the hard, cold numbers. Afterall, if the poverty levels are as high as is claimed, it stands to reason that people in these countries will flock to the cheapest handsets. This is lazy thinking, though, as having grown up in Nigeria myself, I can attest to the fact that Nigerians will borrow, beg and steal (and overextend themselves financially) to buy the latest, greatest handset. The ‘posher’ a phone is, the greater appeal it holds for Nigerians. Fact. Check it up yourself if you are in doubt.

This leads to the question of why, in spite of my assertion, the iPhone adoption rate in Nigeria is so low. Instead, it’s the Blackberry that rules the roost. Loads of my friends who – while in London – used the iPhone discarded it for a Blackberry once they got back to the developing world. This intrigued me and I set about asking quite a few of them why they abandoned the iPhone for a Blackberry. Their responses were even more interesting. There were two main reasons, apparently:

1. BBM. The level of usage of the blackberry messenger service in Nigeria is unprecedented. Literally every Blackberry owner in Nigeria uses the messenger service. Very actively too and not just occasionally. A lot of communications happens via this medium and I have myself been forced into getting a Blackberry primarily so I can keep in touch with my sisters, both of whom are Blackberry owners and for whom communicating via the messenger service is cheaper and more convenient than sending text messages or calling.

2. No credible (or affordable) data plans. The iPhone is a great device for mobile communications and this is irrefutable. I would like to find out the usage stats for iPhone users of voice and SMS vs data. I’m willing to bet that the voice and SMS usage on iPhone probably accounts for an average of about an average of 5% of the total usage. The remainder 95% is dependent on 3G or WiFi data. Mobile service providers in the developing world don’t have great or affordable rates for mobile data usage and even if they do, the nature of this part of the world makes it difficult to serve pay monthly customers and PAYG for mobile data usage is ‘suicidal’ for customers as they can very quickly run out of credits due to apps updating in the background alone.

The attraction of the Blackberry service in this region is due to the fact that their customers pay a flat monthly rate for unmetered Internet connectivity which is delivered via the Blackberry infrastructure, thereby bypassing the mobile operators almost completely. At the moment, no other smartphone can compete with this. Android, iOS, WebOS, Windows Phone, etc all have the same weakness: dependency on data plans, and this is a big stumbling block for penetration of this market.

Anyone who reckons that Android penetration in the developing world is only a matter of course as a result of the affordability misses a trick or two if they don’t take the lack of data connectivity into account.

Related articles

• Millennial Media Mobile Mix Report: iOS Produced 47% Of App Revenue, Android 36% (mobilemarketingwatch.com)
• InMobi: Android has surpassed iPhone OS for the first time (mobile-ent.biz)

Anyone close to me will know that I consume books. I don’t stop till I’ve read a book to the very end, if I find it captivating. I particularly love the Fantasy genre and they tend to come in epics, which means at least a Trilogy. That is a lot of reading!

I heard about George R. R. Martins’ “A Game of Thrones” through a colleague at work and I thought I’d give it a try. The first book (A song of Ice and Fire) was amazing and I immediately purchased the second one on my Kindle. I was hooked on George R. R. Martin.

The second started to get really dark and George Martin seemed to think it was a good idea to kill and cripple all the ‘good’ guys that you had spent so much time getting to know in his first book.

This gets worse in the subsequent books and, frankly, the drop in pace also makes it seem as though he just wants to sell books instead of tell a story. Discovering that book 3 was in two parts (as in two – expensive – books) probably didn’t endear me to George Martin either.

So here I am. Totally uninterested in the fourth installment of the story. Reviews on Amazon indicate a pedestrian pace and lack of direction.

Mr Martin, I want to see Bran fly… I want Jaime Lannister to clean out his house… I’d like to see Jon Snow get some respect and Arya reunited with her Greywolf. Just finish the story!!

I’ve charted my declining interest in the Epic for you as well, Mr Martin.

A chart of my declining interest in "A Game of Thrones"

A few weeks ago, I did the unthinkable and walked into the Apple store on Regent street. Unthinkable because I had banned myself from visiting any Apple store without my significant other beside me as the temptation to splurge on yet another iDevice would be too much.

I was able to resist buying any Apple products but could not stop myself from picking up a Plantronics BackBeat 906 bluetooth headphone to finally get rid of wires!

Disappointingly, the headphones would only work with my iPhone 4 held in my hand, directly in front of my face. Making me look totally ridiculous. I tried the headphones with my iPad, though, and it worked like a charm! I could keep the iPad in my rucksack and still hear music playing clearly in the headphones. Progress! The only difference between my iPad and iPhone was that I had the developer build of iOS 4.2 on the iPad.

This morning, I finally updated my iPhone 4 to iOS 4.2.1 and voila! The bluetooth headphones work now. I don’t have to hold my phone in my hand while making a phone call nor do I have to bring it out when I’m trying to be as inauspicious as possible while playing music or listening to the radio  in the ‘dodgier’ parts of London.

I’ve got to say it was a pleasant surprise to discover that I’ve got no bluetooth frustrations any longer.

Thank you Apple!

If you are – like me – continually struggling to keep abreast of your RSS feed subscriptions for technology news, then you probably – like I do – consume lots of news about Apple.

The recent announcement of the Mac App Store is a welcome one and is one that has been making the rumour rounds for a long while. Looking at this from the perspective of the overwhelming success of the iOS app store, it only makes sense for Apple to provide a similar means for generating even more revenue whilst attracting even more developers to the Apple fold as a result of better chances of visibility for smaller applications.

I welcome this.

Interestingly, one other problem that this solves is that of the state of application installation on the Mac at the moment. I’ve always thought that installing applications was one of the more difficult things to do on a Mac and I’ve had many a frustrating moment teaching a newbie to Mac OS how to install software and trying to explain why the installation process was so counter-intuitive.

At last, Mac users in the non-techie demographic will be able to find and install software just as easy as they can on the iOS devices they (probably) already own.

I’ve got to admit that I’m excited about this new store. Not as a consumer, mind you, as I won’t be spending a lot of money buying software I reckon, but instead as a potential Mac developer who can build an app that does one thing and does it really well who then doesn’t have to worry about how to market his software.

Is this the death knell for MacHeist and other software bundling products? Quite possibly.

in full bloom

It’s a peaceful Saturday afternoon and I’ve decided to stay home and get some well-deserved rest and relaxation after a pretty manic week.

The photo in this post has nothing really to do with today being saturday nor anything in particular with the post itself, but just a general reflection of what I feel the most today – at peace.

After over a year of recurring chronic health worries, it looks like it’s a new dawn for me and – at the moment – I am relishing the feeling of being well. After a while, you start to forget just how it is to be well and without any worries

I’m also using this opportunity to try out the Zemanta plugin to see how mature semantic content management has got since my days back in University of Surrey with Professor Ahmad teaching us about ontologies and so on…

We’re late to the wedding reception. It’s a typical Saturday afternoon and the rain chooses to add something different to the mix. Typically. This time round we’ve roused ourselves to go to a friend’s wedding in London and we’re on the Barnet high street looking for a place to park.

Surprisingly, we find quite a few spaces and I manage to slot my car into one of them with relative ease. “I’ve got to pay for parking,” I thought to myself. That was when the nightmare started.From one parking meter to the next. And the next, and the next. After a few minutes, there was a contingent of us trooping from one parking meter to the other in search one a single one that would serve to issue tickets.

Problem was that the meter either ‘ate’ our coins without returning any ticket or would absolutely refuse to come on. We gave up eventually and were resolved to driving to park at the nearest train station as we’d been told there was parking there. On our way back to our cars, we discovered that the other cars that had parked along the high street had encountered difficulty paying as well and the drivers had all stuck notes on their dashboards with various messages for the the Barnet traffic warden making the rounds.

“parking meter not working”
“Meter ‘ate’ my coins”
“parking meter bad. Tried calling the number on the side but no one picked up”

Even though the drivers of these vehicles knew that the general rule is that non-functional parking meters were not an excuse for not paying to park, this particular situation was exceptional and they decided to dare the authorities and see if their bluff would be called. I elected to do the same and wrote a most elaborate note, which I stuck on my dashboard.

I was not issued a parking ticket. Thankfully. That would have been a nuisance as I was a bit short of cash during that period.

In case you are wondering why the parking meters were not working, I discovered that they were all solar powered and a combination of a succession of gloomy days and almost endless rain meant that the meters could not be charged and there clearly was no backup power supply for these things. This made me wonder why – in this country where we hardly get sufficient sunlight – someone would elect to install solar powered traffic meters. Its almost as though the council has determined that revenue collection is secondary to its ‘green’ credentials.

It’s a strange one and I would love to know why and how the council came to the decision to install these machines. I’d also love to find out how much revenue has been lost as a result of these faulty pay machines and how much council tax would have to rise to offset these losses.

Thank goodness my local council doesn’t use these machines as I’d rather the peace of mind of having paid to park than the mental torment of wondering if a ticket has been issued to me.

We had fun at the wedding reception, though and were absolutely chuffed for my friend who was getting married.

The iPad

On the 27th of January, Apple Inc made an announcement (and released a product) that they believe could completely change the way we think about computing and the associated tasks. This is in stark contrast, though, to the tech punditry and the majority of hard-core techies who have publicly expressed their views either though their personal blogs or via telling comments in blog articles associated with this product.

Pro-Apple bloggers are torn between their love for the company and their dashed hopes on the feature list (or lack thereof) of the Apple iPad. I can’t blame them either. At a point I was also expecting biometric identification, front and rear multi-touch controls, and not even discarding the possibility for teleportation and ability to shoot tractor beams at my enemies!!! Clear case of ‘featuritis‘ if ever there was any.

Disclaimer: My friends call me a mac head and I’m currently composing this blog on my iPhone on the train from London.

I’d like to start with the negatives that my close tech-friends have highlighted. Before I do though, I can’t help categorising them into those Apple naysayers who would criticise sliced bread if it had been introduced by Apple, and the neutrals who are just sceptical. Ordinarily, I wouldn’t bother addressing the former who are just zealots in my opinion. But I will try. No point letting them stand in the path of an onrushing train with their eyes firmly shut and their fingers plugging their ears!!

Here are their major gripes, in no particular order:

1. The iPad is underpowered with a mere max of 64GB of hard disk space and 1GHz CPU;
2. The iPad is not portable and can’t be put in the pocket;
3. It’s based on a closed platform iPhone OS and therefore places users in Apple’s walled garden – an annoyance for people who want more control;
4. Lack of multitasking;
5. No support for Adobe Flash;
6. The bezel is too wide and it makes the device ugly;
7. There’s just no category of user this device could appeal to;
8. Lack of a physical keyboard makes it impractical for long-term use;
9. It’s just a big iPhone. No revolution, just an evolution.

Why I think the iPad is an important revolution in computing

Every so often, we encounter a new technology. A disruptive product which shakes our very foundational beliefs on HOW things are meant to be done that possibly also threatens our careers and suddenly makes us aware that we’ve just spent a couple of decades of our lives learning a technology that suddenly becomes irrelevant. Let me try to explain.

In 1984, when Apple introduced the Mac, majority (if not all) of computer users were typing commands into their white text on black screen consoles for every single thing they needed to do on their computer. The idea of using a mouse with a pointer and a GUI met with a LOT of sniggering from the geek community and was considered a toy until Microsoft realised the potential of the GUI and introduced it in their own Operating System as Windows OS. People then started to take interest and suddenly, they could not live without the mouse. At that moment, those techies whose jobs involved memorising all those DOS commands suddenly became much less relevant than they used to be (of course, Windows OS was so terrible in the early days that it wasn’t uncommon to see people ducking and diving between the DOS prompt and Windows to fix one issue after the other). Even in the *nix community, it is clearly established that the only way to compete with Apple is to give people simple ways to do things. Canonical (the stewards of Ubuntu) share this philosophy and my own little social experiment of throwing my sister in front of a computer installed with Ubuntu 9.10 and watching her use Firefox to browse Facebook, use OpenOffice to work on a document and playing music all of which which she was able to do successfully.

Fast-forward to 2007. Apple announces the iPhone. Again, this announcement is met with derision, sniggers, and suggestions from the technology world that the iPhone was going to fail. How can Apple release a phone into an already saturated market and hope to take 1% of the market share? And yet, 75 million iPhones have been sold since July 2007 and most of the users of the device are happy with it (except AT&T users in the US who have network problems to contend with). The same touch screen that was derided and mocked in 2007 was quickly adopted by ALL of the major (and minor) handset manufacturers and this form factor is now ubiquitous in mobile technology.

There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.
– Steve Ballmer, 2007

All of the complaints about lack of tactile feedback on the keyboard have been replaced by admiration for the way the software keyboard on the iPhone and Android devices have been implemented. Hardcore BlackBerrry users (and employees) will, of course, argue that you cannot substitute the effect of the physical keyboard on their mobiles in the same way that I would argue that you can’t substitute the mouse totally for the keyboard/command line combo as the techie guys out there know that there are still a lot of tasks that can be done better and quicker through the command line than via the GUI. That the iPhone has been a roaring success is a fact that cannot be disputed. It should, in fact, be applauded because it survived despite the efforts of the mobile carriers who didn’t have the iPhone exclusivity deal and the handset manufacturers who suddenly realised that Apple was sneaking into their garden uninvited and with a game-changing product. Now, we are finally delivered from the diabolical mobile software of Samsung and Motorola and have been shown that Nokia’s OS can be bettered. Dramatically! We are now empowered with the knowledge that we can ask for more, and we can get it. And Google is now riding on top of all of the momentum that is being built by Apple to basically give away their software for free. All the better for the consumer and choice.

Finally, Apple have delivered yet another game-changing technology. The iPad. With all due respect to Microsoft in acknowledgement of their being first to produce Tablet computers back in 2001, I should instead say that Apple has applied their ‘touch’ to yet another technology to show us how we can truly interact with Tablet computers. From now onwards, permit me to refer to these devices as Tablets or Tablet Devices because I believe Apple is now trying to abstract us away from computers and computing so we can leave computing to programmers, office workers, computer scientists, engineers, data analysts, video editors, etc. Those people who REALLY NEED to compute anything. For the rest of us, we just need a device that can perform the tasks that we take on when we are at home or/and on the move. We mostly want to check and update our Facebook and Twitter status, check and send emails, listen to music, share photos with friends and family, update our blogs, visit our favourite websites, etc. No rocket science or neurosurgery. Just plain everyday stuff we do with our computers nowadays.

John Gruber could not have said this any better when he illustrated the abstraction as being analogous to modern cars and how we just jump into them nowadays and drive off and just expect them to work.

Used to be that to drive a car, you, the driver, needed to operate a clutch pedal and gear shifter and manually change gears for the transmission as you accelerated and decelerated. Then came the automatic transmission. With an automatic, the transmission is entirely abstracted away. The clutch is gone. To go faster, you just press harder on the gas pedal.

That’s where Apple is taking computing. A car with an automatic transmission still shifts gears; the driver just doesn’t need to know about it. A computer running iPhone OS still has a hierarchical file system; the user just never sees it.

The computer industry has jerked its knees yet again and is once more claiming that this is yet another Apple product that will fail. Catastrophically, they say. There is no room for this technology in people’s lives. I have given quite some thought to this iPad criticism and I find it to be valid but mostly unfounded.

The iPad is underpowered with a mere max 64GB of hard disk space and 1GHz CPU

I spend about 14 hours a day on my computer (not counting the time I spend with my iPhone, which is more-or-less a computer and the time I spend with my camera) most of which time can be roughly divided into developing software (Java EE, PHP) and processing the images I’ve taken with my camera using Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom. I am what you would describe as a power hungry user. I’ve got a 64-bit Macbook Pro with 4GB of RAM and a 320GB hard drive (as well as a 2 TeraByte NAS) and I’m still hungry for more. For the kind of stuff I do daily, the iPad is grossly underpowered and I would agree with anyone who made that claim. However, I do have reason to share my web creations with people and even more so my photos – especially now that I can’t stop taking photos of my newly born daughter so I can hear everyone around exclaim just how gorgeous she is! My digital SLR shoots images at 10.1 megapixels and since I shoot my images in RAW mode, each image file is 10.1MB. I don’t share RAW images, though. I share processed jpegs that are much smaller. If I, therefore, had loads of images of my daughter that I wanted to share with friends I would still need about 64,000 high resolution pictures of her (at 1MB each) to test the space limit of the iPad. Of course, this is not taking Moore’s law into consideration.

The iPad is not portable and can’t be put in the pocket

I was not privileged to be at the Keynote last week but have seen the video since. Not once was it mentioned there that this device was meant to be slipped in the pockets. When Microsoft announced the tablet computer back in 2001, no one complained about its not being portable enough! What’s the problem now? I believe this device is meant to be used at home although it can be used on the road if it’s put in a satchel and can be used in airport lounges, on trains, and even for presentations. I do like Rob Foster’s take on this (see the second example).

As I mentioned from the previous post, I do like to share pictures I’ve taken with friends when they visit. At the moment, I either have to load up my PlayStation 3 image gallery which connects to my NAS and can browse through the pictures I’ve stored in it or I hand them my mac. The former means that no one can watch TV for the duration that one or two people are checking the images and the latter makes me very nervous as I like to be the only person that touches my computer! It is much more convenient to hand my tablet device across the room to our visiting friends than to hand them my precious laptop.

It’s based on a closed platform iPhone OS and therefore places users in Apple’s walled garden – an annoyance for people who want more control

75 million are in this ‘walled garden’ and hardly anyone is complaining. Those who were complaining have moved to the the Nexus one Motorola Droid and they’re happy with it! Everyone goes home smiling

Seriously, though, those who are complaining about Apple’s draconian handling of the App Store and what applications to allow on it are not far off the mark. They can improve on things in that department. What we don’t want, though, is the much-lauded cavalier (open) nature of the Android store which allowed ‘rogue applications’ to be installed onto Android users’ phones with the net result that their financial details were stolen by malicious hackers.

Lack of multitasking

It will come. I’ll hedge my bets on iPhone OS 4.0 coming with Apple’s implementation of multitasking. Again, the millions of iPhone users out there don’t even know what multitasking is and therefore don’t care about it. The upside for them, of course, is optimal battery life.

No support for Adobe Flash

I don’t think I can do as much justice to this topic as John Gruber has done. Do visit his blog to read on Flash and its relevance in today’s world.

The bezel is too wide and it makes the device ugly

I’ll reserve my comment on this until I see the device and actually hold it in my hands.

There’s just no category of user this device could appeal to

I’ll let you in on something that has worried me over the past few weeks. My mother-in-law came in to town to help with the little one and she wants to learn to use a computer. She’s not had any reason to interact with one all her life but now wants an email account so that she can communicate with her family and her children. I’ve been wondering how to approach teaching her. Should I teach her on a Mac, a PC, a Linux computer? (problem is we only run Mac OS and Ubuntu in my home) How do I explain the right-click vs left-click paradigm to her? It’s daunting and I didn’t think I could do it until I saw the video of the unveiling of the Tablet. This device will do everything that mama wants without all the hassle and hair-pulling of learning about computers or going to computer school! It’s perfect for what she wants to do. A no-brainer!! Already, Omni Group have laid out plans to move their entire product line to the iPad and are starting to do so. All the major gaming houses want to develop games for this gorgeous screen real-estate. The publishing industry has gone crazy and the effect is already being felt with Amazon and Macmillan having a public tiff. I think with a little mind-expansion exercise and patience to see what developers come up with in terms of application, we will see the potential that this device has.

Lack of a physical keyboard makes it impractical for long-term use

Maybe. Maybe not. We can’t tell for sure until we’ve used it. Initial criticism of the iPhone software keyboard turned out to be baseless as the typing experience on it (after a couple of frustrating hours), turned out way better than anything I had experienced previously with Nokia’s T9. I’ll withhold my opinion on this until I can base it on fact.

It’s just a big iPhone. No revolution, just an evolution.

Like Bill Gates said back in the days: “Developers! Developers!! Developers!!!” I’m really excited about the fact that the iPhone developers have already started downloading and working with the SDK for the iPad. I’m looking forward to what’s in stock and I’m pretty sure that we will all be astonished at what they are able to come up with – much as we were with the Ocarina and Shazam apps!

Everyone is welcome to the table

Google is starting to flex their brain muscle in development of a touch-based UI for their Chrome operating system and any development in this can only be welcome as this would drive innovation and provide competition which will bring down the cost of ownership and ultimately benefit the consumer. You. But, in the mean time, don’t fold your arms and declare that because something beats your imagination it means no one else can envision it!

Over the past couple of weeks, anyone who has had one ear on the ground for technology-related news would (must) have heard that Google’s servers got attacked by the Chinese government. What people may not know, in addition, is that many other top Silicon Valley corporations were hit by these audacious attacks.

I don’t know if some of these attacks were successful. They were definitely detected, though and Google reckons they were only able to get the subject lines of the emails sent and received by the people being ‘investigated’ by the Chinese government (mostly human rights activists). I give kudos to Google for standing up to the Chinese government and risking the potential loss of the largest single market in the world.

The typical Internet user (myself inclusive) will – at this point – turn to something else just after thinking to myself “all this hacker stuff is beyond me anyways… don’t these guys have time for more productive stuff?” That’s not the right thing to do or think at this moment, though. Why? Because Microsoft has fessed up that their Internet Explorer browser has had a huge security flaw since September last year that has been exploited by these hackers.

Again, you may wonder what exactly that has to do with you. Simply put, the Internet Explorer browser (possibly your browser of choice) was used as the ‘attack vector’ for targeting Google and other Silicon Valley corporations. This got so worrying that the French and German governments officially advised their citizens to download other browsers and stop using Microsoft’s Internet Explorer – at least until the vulnerabilities were fixed.

Which leads me to the Nigerian situation. I use Google Analytics to monitor web traffic to all my websites and the trend over the past month is as follows:

• Internet Explorer : 32%
• Mozilla Firefox : 29%

Quite a number of my website visitors are Nigerians (in the country and outside of it) and from these statistics, it’s clear that Nigerians still prefer Microsoft. The reasons for this would be multiple and I can immediately think of the difficulty of downloading any other browser substitute with the extremely slow and metered Internet access that is available in the country. Also, a lack of education on how much better Firefox is than IE and the paucity of computers in primary and secondary schools as well as in our tertiary institutions ensure that any knowledge of better browsers than IE – or even the recognition that IE is merely the window to the Internet and not the Internet itself, remains esoteric and limited to the knowing few who are probably from rich or upper-middle class families and have the computers and access at home.

It does not behoove our government to educate us about this either as Microsoft have them pocketed. Deep-pocketed. Embarrassingly so. Technology solutions in the upper echelons of our government mean only one thing: Microsoft. Anyone advocating any alternative solution is mocked and summarily ignored. I won’t go into that, though.

Instead, I would like to know what the relevant technology bodies in our country are actually doing to protect us from cyber crime? This especially as a great percentage of global cybercrime originates from Nigeria … why have we not been warned as a country to be careful what we click online? We have not been told that there is a security vulnerability in IE that could leave us open to compromise and could lead to our computers being used as attack vectors on other people?

Does anyone know the name of the organisation in Nigeria that exists for the purpose of policing this kind of stuff?